Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Is McMillan guilty or not? (Due Thursday)

Use two case clues to prove your point in a concise paragraph.

Below are the case clues:


Case # 4: Walter McMillan

The Crime
On a Saturday morning in November, 1986, Ronda Morrison opened the Jackson Cleaners in Monroeville, Alabama by herself and served several customers by 10 AM. At around 10:45, some customers entered the store, but could find no one working there. They looked around and finally discovered Ronda's body on the floor. She was dead. There was no apparent blood, and it appeared the victim had been sexually assaulted. It also appeared that money had been taken from the cash register.
The local police began their investigation without waiting for experts from the state crime lab to arrive. Their search for fingerprints was hindered by the presence of so many prints from customers and by the police's relative inexperience. They did find five spent shell casings from a .25 caliber handgun. A subsequent autopsy revealed three slugs in Ronda's body, including one fired from close range. The coroner concluded that she had lived for about five minutes after being shot. No bodily fluids were found on her body, or on her clothing.
When an officer from the Alabama Bureau of Investigation finally arrived on the scene, there was fingerprint powder on nearly every surface and Ronda's body had already been taken to the funeral home, thus making accurate fingerprinting and a detailed examination of fibers at the scene, hairs, the exact location of the body, facial expression, the color of the victim's skin, and similar evidence, impossible.







The Suspect
Police interviewed several suspects and a reward was posted, but the crime remained unsolved for seven months. At that time, Ralph Myers, a white man with a long criminal record, was arrested for the murder of another young woman in Alabama. He was interrogated about Ronda Morrison's murder and eventually stated that Walter McMillan, a 46-year-old black man from Monroe County, had killed Ronda. Two other witnessed corroborated parts of Myers's story. McMillan was reputed to be a marijuana dealer and was dating a white woman from the area. He had a minor criminal record.

The Trial
The defense asked that the trial be moved from Monroe County because of all the publicity surrounding the case. The judge agreed to move the trial from Monroe County to Baldwin County, which had a substantially smaller percentage of black people in its population. Testimony at the trial lasted one and a half days. The evidence against McMillan consisted chiefly in the following testimony:

The Trial
1. Ralph Myers said that he and McMillan drove to Jackson Cleaners on November 1. He said that while waiting for McMillan he heard popping noises, went into the store himself and saw McMillan near the victim's body with money in his hands.

The Trial
2. Bill Hooks testified that he had seen McMillan’s "low-rider" truck near the Cleaners on the morning of the murder and that he had seen Myers and McMillan driving away from the Cleaners. Hooks said that he had tried to give the police some of this evidence the night of the crime, after he had been arrested for urinating in public.
The Trial
3. A surprise witness, Joe Hightower, who the prosecution said had only stepped forward four days earlier, testified that he, too, saw the "low-rider" truck near the Cleaners on November 1, 1986. Hightower said that he had seen the same truck many times before and that he knew it was McMillan’s truck because he had been to McMillan’s house to buy marijuana. His comment about buying marijuana was stricken from the record.

The Trial
McMillan’s defense attorney called six witnesses who testified that he was at his home on the morning of November 1, taking part in a fish-fry. McMillan did not testify. He was found guilty of first degree murder during a robbery.

The Trial
The penalty phase of the trial to determine if a death sentence should be given began immediately after the guilty verdict. The prosecution put on no witnesses. The defense put on only one witness, Walter McMillan. McMillan tried to explain that he was innocent of the crime and that he did not know Ralph Myers, but the judge cut him off, since this phase was about punishment, not guilt.

The Trial
In its closing argument, the state emphasized the beauty of Ronda's life and the cruelty of her murder. The defense argued that only God should decide who lives and who dies. Only once did the attorney mention McMillan.

Meet the victim and her family
Ronda Reene Morrison was a pretty 18-year-old junior college school student at the time of her death in November, 1986. She worked part-time at Jackson Cleaners, a dry cleaning establishment in the town of Monroeville, Alabama. Ronda Morrison was a popular girl who easily made other people smile. She weighed 120 pounds, but often worried about her weight. In high school, she attended Monroe Academy, the private all-white high school formed by town parents to avoid racial integration. Ronda knew few black people, and none of them well. She still liked watching Walt Disney fairy tales and she believed that basically everyone was good deep down.





Meet the victim and her family
Ronda was Charles and Bertha Morrison's only child, and they considered her to be a gift from God. Mr. Morrison worked at a paper mill and Mrs. Morrison worked at a garment factory. They were not well-to-do, but had a comfortable house. After the guilty verdict, they prepared a short victim-impact statement. They said, "Our life had centered around our daughter. Now that she is gone we have no goal in life." Before submitting their victim-impact statement, they consulted with their minister at Eastwood Baptist Church. He urged them to forgive Walter McMillan, but also to demand his execution. The Morrison's wrote: "This man took our daughter's life and should pay with his own."

Meet the defendant
Walter McMillan was married to Minnie McMillan for 25 years. They had met as teenagers. When Minnie became pregnant in 1962, they were married. During their first year together, they almost starved, with Walter working as a field hand for $14 per week. They lived in a sharecropper's shack.

Meet the defendant
Walter often sought better work to support his family. Sometimes Minnie went with him, at other times she stayed in Monroeville. He suffered some work related injuries and eventually came back to Monroeville and opened his own land clearing business. On the side, he sold marijuana. One of his customers was a white woman named Karen Kelly. They became romantically involved. In the midst of her own legal troubles, Kelly had accused McMillan of another murder. McMillan’s arrest record consisted of one conviction for possession of marijuana, for which he was fined $100; one charge of selling marijuana, which was dropped; and one charge for cutting another man with a knife outside a nightclub, for which he was given a year's probation.






Meet the defendant

It was very difficult for Minnie to raise the money to pay for Walter's defense. Her church and the local black community helped. At times, the attorneys threatened to stop working if they were not paid. Minnie was upset when she learned about Karen Kelly, but she steadfastly believed in Walter's innocence.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

I believe that McMillian is guilty there is enought evidence that shows he is. However this man does not have a huge criminal record witnesses say they saw him outside the crime scene that day. McMillian also has been charged with possesion of selling drugs. I believe this man is guilty and should receaive the dealth sentence for the life that he killed

By Danielle O'Brien

Anonymous said...

I think that McMillan is guilty because there are many witnesses that saw his car outside the store on the day of the murder. McMillan himself did not testify to prove his innocence. McMillan was found with cash that seems to link him to the money missing from the cash register.The most important witness Ralph Myer claims taking him to the store all the clues point back to Mcmillan so he is guilty. By Ruben Garcia

Anonymous said...

I don't thin Walter McMillan is guilty of the murder of Ronda Morrison because he wasn't around when she was killed

Anonymous said...

I think McMillan isnt guilty because they have no real evidence againt him. They have witnesses who may be lieing to cover up their own tracks and who McMillan saids he doesnt know. They also don't have any forensic evidence because the body was fully examined. The people in that town were new to the scene and didnt really know what to do so why should they be the ones sending him to jail. There was also witnesses that said he was not there but at home. Why werent what they said taken into considertaion.


Nyema Gadson

Anonymous said...

i think that Mcmillan is not guilty because he had 6 people saying that he was at home while the murder took place and ryan myers who said that he saw Mcmillan standing over ronda's dead body has commited crimes and is also a suspect for the murder. he probably only said he saw these things so that he could look innocent. Ronda's body also didnt have any bodily fluids on her clothes and after being shot three times there has to be some type of blood on her if she was shot by Mcmillan
-Brittney Ainsworth

Anonymous said...

I don't believe that McMillan is guilty. There is too much evidence for his case that the only reason he was convicted was that his "friend", Ralph Myers, said he saw McMillan with the cash. But if Myers saw McMillan with the cash, next to the dead body, why didn't Myers call the police. Another reason why he couldn't have done it is there is no DNA to support his part in the crime. The DNA was gone after the cops took the body away. But even after that, wouldn't there be fingerprints on the register or any other part of the store. He was wrongly accused and shouldn't be convicted.
Michael Deshaies

Anonymous said...

mcmillan is guilty and should serve life in prison

Anonymous said...

Though there WERE some Witnesses that have claimed to have seen Walter McMillan pull up to, and then promptly go into the Cleaners, I don't actually see a witness say that they heard gun shots, or seen him RUSH into the truck and speed off. Both of which are loud noises, the sound of a gunshot (not to mention 5), and the screeching of a truck becoming a getaway vehicle, so honestly, I think that McMillan is NOT GUILTY. I say this because the two testimonies that were against him were by people of rather questionable trust-ability. One man was arrested for public urination, and the other stupidly admitted to having had bought drugs before, so what is to say that they were not bribed into their stories, or they were not level-headed at the time and mistook McMillan for someone else. On the other hand, McMillan had six testimonies that said he was home at the time.


- Jahvon Gordon

Anonymous said...

I BELEIVE THAT HE IS NOT GULITY BECAUSE THERE WAS NO EVEIDENCE LINKING HIM TO THE CRIME. ALSO, A WITNESS WAS A MAN THAT WAS BEING INVESTIGATED FOR THE MUDER OF ANOTHER WOMAN. ALSO, THEY SAID HE SHOT HER IN THE STORE. IF HE SHOT HER IN THE STORE WHERE WAS THE BLOOD. SO THEY HAVE NOTHING TO CHARGE HIM WITH.

CLEVELAND BYFIELD JR

Anonymous said...

Well i believe that Walter McMillan is innocent because there is no evidence in the world that he committed the and Ralph Meyers could be lying because Mr.Meyers has a huge past of violent crimes so why somebody with out one????
Young Mo$e$

Kenny said...

I believe that Walter McMillan is not guilty simply because the evidence does not prove anything. Some witnesses state that they saw McMillan's low rider outside of the Dry cleaners the morning of Ronda's murder. but i think that those witnesses lied and were probably paid to to testify against McMillan. Also Ronda knew few black people so there's less of a chance that she even knew McMillan so theres no reason that he would murder her. Also McMillan has a very minor criminal record as though Ralph Myers has a very lengthy criminal record.
By Kenneth Cortavarria

Anonymous said...

I dont think McMillan is guilty because they have no real evidence againt him,They have witnesses who maybe lying to cover up them self...I feel dat since they cant support that he did it he isn't guilty!
...Destiny Santiago...

Anonymous said...

i think Mcmillian is guilty because there is enough evidence that prooves he killed the lady. He also has a long criminal record.